7 Best Bullet Journal Notebooks for PhD Students in 2025 (Tested & Ranked)
When I first started my Ph.D., I struggled with keeping track of everything. Research notes scattered across different notebooks, meeting minutes lost in digital files, and brilliant ideas forgotten because I had nowhere reliable to capture them. The entire process felt chaotic, and I worried that my disorganization would derail my academic progress.
What I discovered was that most PhD students face this same challenge. Luckily there is a vibrant community that propose a solution. The journaling community has become fascinated with notebooks featuring 160 gsm paper [12], and after testing dozens of options myself, I understand why. PhD work demands more than a simple notepad - it requires a system that can handle the complexity of multi-year research projects.
During my search for the right notebook, I found myself examining paper weights, binding styles, and durability features I never knew existed. The Leuchtturm1917, with its 249 numbered pages of 80gsm cream-colored paper [13], seemed like the obvious choice given its reputation. Meanwhile, newer companies like Archer & Olive were gaining attention with their bright white 160gsm paper [4] [14] and have become one of the fastest-growing bullet journal notebooks [14], especially among those who need multimedia functionality and appreciate supporting woman-owned businesses [4].
After extensive testing throughout my academic career, I realized that the perfect bullet journal isn't necessarily the most expensive or the most popular. Instead, it's the one that actually improves your workflow and supports your specific research needs. Sometimes, I had moments where I thought I'd found the ultimate notebook, only to discover limitations that made it impractical for daily academic use.
I hope that, as a reader, you can benefit from my trial-and-error process and avoid the frustration of choosing notebooks that look impressive but fail in practice. The seven notebooks in this guide have been tested specifically for academic work - not just for their paper quality, but for how well they support the actual demands of doctoral research. Each has been evaluated based on features that matter most to PhD students: paper performance with various writing instruments, durability under heavy use, organizational features, and value for long-term academic projects.
Oxford Ring-Bound A5 Notebook
Image Source: Oxford Notebooks
To understand why I recommend Oxford Ring-Bound A5 notebooks above all others, I need to share what happened during my second year of PhD work. I was sitting in a crowded library, desperately trying to cross-reference three different sources while taking notes on a fourth. My hardbound notebook kept closing on itself, forcing me to hold it open with one hand while writing with the other. The entire process felt clunky and inefficient.
That frustration led me to discover the twin wire binding design that sets Oxford notebooks apart from traditional options. The method starts with a physical notebook, and I prefer ring-bound notebooks, such as those by Oxford, since they are sturdy and allow me to view two pages at once while the notebook is lying on my desk.
Oxford Ring-Bound Key Features
Oxford Ring-Bound notebooks include several features that solve common problems PhD students face during research work. The twin wire binding allows the notebook to lay flat or fold back on itself, making it ideal for desk work when referencing multiple sources [15]. This design proved essential when I needed to compare methodology sections across multiple papers while drafting my own research approach.
Most models include a repositionable bookmark that doubles as a ruler [4]. The notebooks are also compatible with the free Scribzee app, which lets you scan, save, and share your notes digitally [15].
The notebooks come in various designs including hardcover, softcover, and different fashion colors. From professional-looking options like the Black n' Red series to more vibrant choices in pastel and metallic finishes [4], there's flexibility for different academic settings.
Oxford Ring-Bound Paper Quality
The 90gsm Optik Paper [4] surprised me with its performance. During my testing, I expected thicker paper to automatically mean better quality, but Oxford's 90gsm paper consistently outperformed much heavier alternatives. This high-quality paper allows writing on both sides with minimal show-through, which maximizes usable space - something crucial when taking extensive research notes.
Customer reviews consistently describe the paper quality as "smooth and nice to the touch" [14]. One reviewer noted how the paper "feels great writing on" and "reduces strain when writing large essays" [14] - a benefit I can confirm after countless hours of note-taking during literature reviews.
Oxford Ring-Bound Durability
Throughout my testing period, Oxford notebooks proved remarkably durable under daily academic use. Many models feature hardback or sturdy card covers that protect your notes [14]. Some versions like the Black n' Red series offer waterproof protective design [16], which saved my notes during an unfortunate coffee incident in the library.
The twin wire binding provides exceptional longevity, with customers reporting that "the front and back [are] still intact after a year of use" [14]. For PhD students working on multi-year projects, this durability ensures consistent access to earlier research notes when writing up final results.
Oxford Ring-Bound Price
These notebooks offer remarkable value at £7.50 [4] for most individual A5 models. The pricing varies slightly based on specific features:
- Campus A5+ Card Cover Wirebound Notebooks (140 pages): £7.50 [4]
- Touch A5 Hardback Casebound Notebooks (192 pages): £7.50 [4]
- My Notes A5 Card Cover Wirebound Notebooks (200 pages): £7.50 [4]
Multi-packs provide even better value, such as the 5-pack of Oxford Office A5 notebooks with metallic covers priced at £26.50 [17]. This pricing allows PhD students to stock multiple notebooks without significant financial strain.
Oxford Ring-Bound Best Use Case
These notebooks create a natural demarcation between what is passing (physical notes) and what is reusable (digital notes) - an organizational principle that transformed my research workflow. The physical notebook serves as my initial thought-capture tool, while my digital system stores polished, reusable content.
The combination of quality paper and practical design makes Oxford notebooks ideal for:
- Literature review notes that require frequent referencing
- Conference and seminar note-taking where quick access is needed
- Research methodology planning where diagrams and text need to coexist
- Daily research journals where consistency over months or years is essential
After testing dozens of options, Oxford Ring-Bound notebooks consistently delivered the functionality PhD students actually need, rather than the features that simply look impressive in marketing materials.
SeQes (QiHeng) Notebook
Image Source: Amazon.ca
When I first encountered the SeQes (formerly QiHeng) notebook, I was skeptical. Another thick paper notebook promising premium features at a budget price? I had been disappointed before by products that looked impressive online but failed in practice. However, after several months of testing this notebook alongside my usual Oxford ring-bound system, I found myself genuinely surprised by its performance.
SeQes Key Features
The SeQes bullet journal comes exclusively in A5 size (measuring 5.7" × 8.27"), slightly smaller than true A5 but practically identical for everyday use [7]. Each notebook contains 160 pages of thick 160gsm paper, providing ample space for research notes and planning [8].
What caught my attention initially was the variety of cover options available. You can choose between linen covers with hot-stamped emblems (including the distinctive silver ant design) or PU leather covers with various embossed animals (fox, bear, owl, squirrel) [7]. I chose the linen cover with the ant design, finding it professional enough for academic settings while still being distinctive.
Every SeQes journal includes practical features that I've found useful during my research work:
- An elastic closure band that remains secure and strong
- Two ribbon bookmarks in coordinating colors
- A sturdy elastic pen loop
- An expandable inner back pocket with ribbon-like gussets [12]
The newer 2025 models include page numbers, which I've found crucial for research organization [10]. The notebook opens flat when in use, allowing for uninterrupted writing across both pages [12]. This feature proved particularly valuable when I needed to create detailed research frameworks that spanned multiple pages.
SeQes Paper Quality
The 160gsm paper is undoubtedly the notebook's strongest feature. The pages have a slight coating that creates a smooth, silky writing surface where pens glide effortlessly [7]. This coated paper prevents feathering with fountain pens, a common issue with other thick papers [12].
During my testing, I used various writing instruments including gel pens, fountain pens, and markers. The paper is bright white with light-to-medium gray dots that provide guidance without visual distraction [7]. When compared it directly with other 160gsm notebooks, SeQes outperformed competitors like Archer & Olive and Scribbles That Matter, showing virtually no ghosting [7].
SeQes Durability
The construction quality exceeded my expectations, especially considering the price point. The sewn binding ensures pages won't detach during heavy use [8]. The linen covers, although synthetic, prove more durable than natural linen used in other journal brands [10].
After several months of regular use, every component has held up well - from the secure hot-stamped emblem that passes scratch tests to the well-seated ribbon bookmarks that resist fraying [12]. The back pocket is particularly well-constructed with heavy paper that withstands frequent use [12]. I've stored everything from conference handouts to interview transcripts in this pocket without any tearing or wear.
SeQes Price
As of June 2025, SeQes notebooks are priced at approximately £22.23 (approximately $28), representing excellent value compared to premium competitors [11]. This price point is roughly half that of higher-end 160gsm notebooks while maintaining comparable quality [7].
Each purchase typically includes bonus items like stickers, a grid guide card, and sometimes highlighters, all packaged in a white gift box [12]. While these extras might seem unnecessary, I found the grid guide card surprisingly useful for maintaining consistent layouts.
SeQes Best Use Case
From my experience, the SeQes notebook works best for PhD students who need to incorporate multiple media types in their notes (diagrams, charts, watercolors), prefer minimal ghosting or bleed-through, want premium paper quality without premium pricing, and need a journal that can handle fountain pens without feathering.
I've found this notebook particularly useful for research documentation, literature review mapping, and methodology visualization. The thick paper allows for creative expression alongside academic rigor - perfect for visual thinkers working on complex doctoral projects.
However, this notebook serves a different purpose than the Oxford ring-bound notebooks I typically recommend. While Oxford excels for quick notes and viewing multiple pages simultaneously, the SeQes hardcover format offers a more polished appearance for formal settings like conferences or dissertation meetings. The choice between them depends on whether you prioritize flexibility in your daily workflow or presentation quality in professional settings.
Archer & Olive Notebook
Image Source: Archer and Olive
The bullet journal community has embraced Archer & Olive notebooks with remarkable enthusiasm, particularly because of their thick paper and artistic covers. When I first encountered these notebooks, I understood the appeal immediately - they look absolutely stunning and promise premium performance. However, after months of testing them against my actual PhD workflow, I discovered something important about the difference between what looks impressive and what actually works for serious academic research.
Archer & Olive Key Features
Archer & Olive offers notebooks in multiple sizes including A5 (5.75" x 8.25"), B5, B6 (4.92" x 6.92"), square, and pocket formats [13]. The hardcover designs feature artistic elements - florals, animals, geometric patterns - typically stamped in metallic foil on canvas or faux leather covers [4].
Each notebook includes standard features:
- 160 pages (112 pages in B6 size) [14]
- 5mm dot grid pattern [15]
- Two satin ribbon bookmarks (one often with an attached charm) [4]
- Elastic closure band
- Back document pocket
- Pen holder [4]
What I noticed immediately was what these notebooks don't include compared to more academically-focused options. There are no pre-numbered pages in most models [14], no index pages, and no pen test areas like you might find in notebooks designed specifically for serious note-taking [14]. This absence began to signal something about the intended use case.
Archer & Olive Paper Quality
The 160gsm bright white paper serves as the notebook's main selling point [16]. On paper (excuse the pun), this thickness should eliminate the ghosting and bleed-through problems that frustrate many note-takers [17].
My testing revealed a more complex reality:
The paper handles standard ballpoint pens and gel pens without ghosting [18]. However, fountain pens may feather due to the uncoated, matte finish with considerable "tooth" [14]. The textured surface appeals to some users, particularly those focused on artistic applications [14].
This performance gap becomes significant when you consider the premium pricing and marketing promises. The pure white paper color (rather than cream or off-white) does make colors appear more vibrant [19], which benefits color-coded research systems. But this advantage comes with trade-offs in practical functionality.
Archer & Olive Durability
The sewn binding allows these notebooks to lay completely flat [15], which proves convenient during extended writing sessions. The hardcover construction appears sturdy [4] and provides protection during transport.
However, I found these notebooks less forgiving than ring-bound alternatives during daily academic use. Unlike notebooks where you can remove or add pages as needed, the bound format locks you into a fixed structure. This limitation becomes apparent when conducting research projects that evolve over time or require flexible organization.
Archer & Olive Price
The pricing positions these notebooks firmly in the premium category. Standard A5 dot grid notebooks cost approximately £27.80 (excluding shipping and taxes) [18], while B5 sizes reach around £30.97 [20].
This represents nearly four times the cost of practical alternatives like Oxford notebooks (£7.50). For PhD students working within tight budgets and needing multiple notebooks throughout their programs, this price difference demands careful consideration of actual value received.
Archer & Olive Best Use Case
After extensive testing, I've identified where these notebooks excel and where they fall short for doctoral work:
Best suited for:
- Visual thinkers who incorporate artistic elements into note-taking
- Those working primarily with colored pens and markers
- Users who prioritize aesthetic appeal and decorative spreads
Less suitable for:
- Extended text-heavy research note-taking
- Heavy fountain pen users (due to feathering issues)
- Budget-conscious students needing practical, daily-use notebooks
Here's what I learned about the difference between popular and practical. While Archer & Olive notebooks photograph beautifully and create impressive social media content, they don't address the core organizational challenges that PhD students face. The aesthetic appeal can actually distract from the fundamental purpose - capturing and organizing complex research information efficiently.
The workflow I described earlier - where physical notebooks serve as initial thought-capture tools before transferring important content to digital systems - works best with notebooks designed for function rather than form. Archer & Olive's design priorities seem focused on visual appeal rather than the practical demands of academic research workflows.
Scribbles That Matter Pro
Image Source: All About Planners
When I first encountered Scribbles That Matter Pro notebooks, I was curious whether they could offer a middle ground between budget-friendly options and premium alternatives. After several months of testing, I found these notebooks occupy an interesting position - they address many common concerns about paper quality while avoiding the higher costs of luxury brands.
Scribbles That Matter Key Features
The Pro version distinguishes itself from the Iconic version primarily through its cover design. The Iconic features various doodles, while the Pro maintains a plain, professional appearance suitable for academic environments [21]. The notebook incorporates several elements that PhD students often request:
- 158 numbered pages [1]
- Pre-printed key and color code pages
- Three index pages
- Dedicated pen test page
- Mindfulness reflection page
- Two color-coded ribbon bookmarks
- Pen loop
- Back pocket for document storage
- Elastic closure
The inclusion of center and half-page marks on each page eliminates the need to count dots when creating layouts [5]. The binding allows the notebook to lay completely flat [22], which I found beneficial during long writing sessions where I needed to reference multiple sources simultaneously.
Scribbles That Matter Paper Quality
The current models feature 160gsm paper [1], upgraded from their previous 100gsm version. This change addresses one of the most frequent complaints about academic notebooks - ink bleeding through pages. The paper uses a 5mm dot grid with 34 dots across and 45 dots down [23], providing adequate space for detailed research documentation.
Scribbles That Matter Durability
The Pro version uses a soft vegan leather cover [24] that maintains a professional appearance in academic settings. My testing revealed that the sewn binding holds up well under regular use, keeping pages secure even after months of daily note-taking. Some users have noted quality inconsistencies between different production batches [5], which could be concerning for students planning long-term projects.
The notebook includes a protective sleeve for storage once completed [25], which helps preserve finished research notes - a thoughtful addition for PhD students who need to reference earlier work throughout their multi-year programs.
Scribbles That Matter Price
The Pro A5 dotted notebook costs approximately £19.85 as of 2025 [5], with slight variations based on retailer and cover color. The larger B5 size is priced around £23.82 [26].
This positions Scribbles That Matter between the Oxford notebooks (£7.50) and premium options like Archer & Olive (£27.80). For PhD students who need better paper quality than budget options provide but cannot justify premium pricing, this represents a reasonable compromise.
Scribbles That Matter Best Use Case
Based on my testing, these notebooks work well for PhD students who:
- Require thick paper for various writing instruments
- Need a professional appearance for academic meetings
- Want organizational features like numbered pages and indices
- Seek quality improvements over basic notebooks without premium costs
While I appreciate the attention to organizational details, I continue to recommend Oxford Ring-Bound notebooks for most academic work. The ability to view multiple pages simultaneously and the natural workflow separation between temporary and permanent notes remains more valuable than paper thickness alone. The structured approach to information capture that ring-bound notebooks facilitate often proves more important than the premium paper experience that Scribbles That Matter provides.
Dingbats Wildlife Notebook
Image Source: Dingbats* Notebooks
When I first encountered Dingbats Wildlife notebooks, I was drawn to their environmental mission. As someone who goes through multiple notebooks during a PhD, I felt guilty about the paper waste. The idea of supporting a five-generation Lebanese paper company that prioritizes sustainability appealed to my conscience, even though I worried it might compromise functionality.
Dingbats Key Features
The Dingbats Wildlife series offers A5+ size (15.5 x 21.5 cm) [6], which is slightly larger than standard A5, with 192 pages (96 sheets) of micro-perforated paper [27]. What immediately caught my attention was their thoughtful design approach:
- A hardcover bound with 100% vegan degradable leather featuring a debossed animal silhouette [6]
- Animal footprint patterned endpapers that match the cover animal [28]
- An elastic closure, pen holder, and bookmark [6]
- An expandable pocket in the back cover [28]
What impressed me most was learning that Dingbats donates 2% of all UK revenues to WWF-UK for wildlife conservation [29]. This creates a tangible connection between your note-taking and environmental impact - something I hadn't considered before.
Dingbats Paper Quality
The notebook uses 100gsm cream coated paper that's acid-free and FSC-certified [3]. I'll admit, I was initially skeptical about whether this would meet the demands of intensive PhD work. However, my testing revealed some pleasant surprises.
The paper provides a silky smooth writing surface that prevents ink leakage [29]. The coating creates a sleek feel under the pen while maintaining enough texture for pencil work. When I compared it to other options, Dingbats paper showed minimal ghosting with most pens [2], though it doesn't completely eliminate show-through with very wet fountain pen inks.
Dingbats Durability
One feature that initially concerned me was the cover material being engineered to be degradable after approximately 10 years when composted under controlled conditions [6]. Would this affect daily durability? My testing showed that while environmentally conscious, the notebook remains sturdy enough for academic use.
The sewn binding allows the notebook to open flat [30], which I found helpful during long writing sessions. Even after months of regular use and frequent page-turning during literature reviews, the binding held up well.
Dingbats Price
Dingbats Wildlife notebooks are priced between £15.88 [31] and £25.41 [3], depending on retailer and current promotions. This positions them in the middle range - more expensive than practical options but less costly than premium aesthetic choices.
Dingbats Best Use Case
After extensive testing, I found that Dingbats notebooks work well for PhD students who prioritize environmental responsibility alongside functionality. They excel for creating visually appealing research notes, developing conceptual frameworks with fountain pens, and maintaining a professional appearance in academic settings.
However, I must be honest about their limitations for intensive doctoral work. While the environmental benefits are meaningful, the notebook's bound format doesn't provide the same workflow advantages I've found essential for PhD research. The inability to view multiple pages simultaneously or reorganize sections limits its practical value for complex research projects.
For PhD students who want to reduce their environmental impact while maintaining quality, Dingbats offers a reasonable compromise. Yet for those who need maximum functionality for demanding academic work, other options may serve better.
Minimalism Art Notebook
Image Source: Fountain Pen Love
When I first encountered the Minimalism Art notebook, I was skeptical. Could a notebook priced under £8 really compete with options costing three times more? After months of testing, I discovered that sometimes the most practical solution comes in the simplest package.
Minimalism Art Key Features
The Minimalism Art Classic notebook offers essential features without unnecessary complexity. The A5 (5×8.3 inches) size works well for academic note-taking [32], and each journal includes straightforward elements:
- 192 pages (96 sheets) [32]
- Elastic closure for security [32]
- Ribbon page marker [32]
- Back pocket for loose papers [32]
- Smythe stitched binding [32]
What surprised me most was the vinyl cover with its "slightly squishy grippy feel" that creates a premium tactile experience [32]. Available in various colors including chrome yellow, the notebook opens completely flat with minimal effort [32]. This flat-opening design has proven particularly useful during long research sessions where I need to write continuously across both pages.
Minimalism Art Paper Quality
The cream-colored 100gsm paper exceeded my expectations for this price point [32]. During my testing, pencils performed excellently without smudging, while gel pens, rollerballs, and ballpoints moved smoothly across the surface [32].
Fountain pen users will find the paper handles ink with minimal bleeding, feathering, or strikethrough [32]. However, some reviewers have noted recent quality changes with inconsistent ink absorption [33], which suggests checking your specific batch before committing to important work.
Minimalism Art Durability
The classic Smythe stitching creates a robust binding that allows the notebook to fold over on itself [32]. Throughout my testing period, the construction held up well under regular academic use, making it suitable for extended research projects where durability matters.
Minimalism Art Price
At approximately £7.90 for individual notebooks [32], the Minimalism Art represents exceptional value. Three-packs are available for around £18.26 [32], making it one of the most affordable options available while maintaining reasonable quality standards.
Minimalism Art Best Use Case
For PhD students working with tight budgets, the Minimalism Art notebook provides a practical solution. It works best for those who:
- Need multiple notebooks without significant financial investment
- Prefer a classic hardbound format over ring binding
- Value a notebook that opens flat for extended writing sessions
- Want reliable paper quality without premium pricing
While I still recommend Oxford Ring-Bound notebooks for their superior functionality in academic workflows, the Minimalism Art serves as an excellent backup option. As I've learned from my workflow experience, "Having a physical notebook to jot down ideas means I need to make some effort to transfer these ideas into my digital notes, which I will reuse." This budget-friendly option allows you to maintain that crucial separation between temporary thoughts and permanent research assets without worrying about the cost of multiple notebooks.
Leuchtturm1917 A5 Notebook
Image Source: JetPens
The Leuchtturm1917 represents something interesting in the bullet journal world - a brand that has built its reputation on tradition rather than innovation. Dating back to 1917, this German company has watched the entire bullet journal movement emerge while maintaining the same basic approach. After months of testing this classic option alongside newer competitors, I've come to understand why some PhD students gravitate toward it, and why others might find it frustrating.
Leuchtturm1917 Key Features
What strikes me about Leuchtturm1917 notebooks is how they've designed features specifically for organization:
- 251 numbered pages with blank table of contents [34]
- Two page markers for tracking multiple projects [34]
- Eight perforated detachable sheets [34]
- Gusseted pocket for loose papers [34]
- Thread-bound book that opens flat [34]
- Elastic enclosure band [34]
The pre-numbered pages paired with the table of contents create a system that appeals to methodical thinkers [35]. When you're working on a literature review, for instance, you can note "cognitive theory discussion p. 45-52" in your contents and find it immediately weeks later.
Leuchtturm1917 Paper Quality
Here's where things get complicated. The notebook features 80 g/m² FSC-certified paper with a soft chamois tint that supposedly reduces eye strain [35]. The slightly off-white color does feel easier on the eyes during long writing sessions compared to stark white alternatives.
However, my own experience revealed inconsistent results across different batches. Additionally, some users report excellent fountain pen performance [36], while others encounter bleed-through issues [9]. The paper has more texture than smoother options like Rhodia, which makes it better for pencil work but can cause fountain pens to catch [37].
Leuchtturm1917 Durability
The thread-bound construction does allow the notebook to lie completely flat [34], which becomes important during conference presentations where you need to reference notes while speaking. The hardcover offers decent protection for transport between campus locations and research sites.
Leuchtturm1917 Price
At £15.90 for standard A5 Classic hardcover notebooks [38], the pricing sits in the middle range of options I've tested. Special editions like the Bullet Journal Edition 2 cost £28.90 [38], which pushes into premium territory.
Leuchtturm1917 Best Use Case
After extensive use, I found that Leuchtturm1917 works best for PhD students who prefer traditional organization methods and don't mind potential paper inconsistencies. The numbered pages and index system appeal to those who think linearly about their research.
However, for the kind of dynamic note-taking that doctoral work actually requires, I keep returning to the Oxford ring-bound approach. The physical process of transferring ideas from temporary notes to permanent digital storage creates a natural filter that prevents information overload. The Oxford system supports this workflow better than bound notebooks that lock you into a linear structure, regardless of how well-organized that structure might be.
Making Sense of the Options
After testing seven different notebooks throughout my doctoral journey, I wanted to create a clear overview that would help you avoid the same trial-and-error process I went through. The table below summarizes the key characteristics that matter most for PhD work, based on what I've learned about the actual demands of academic research.
Notebook | Paper Weight | Pages | Key Features | Price (£) | Durability | Best Use Case |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oxford Ring-Bound A5 | 90gsm Optik | 140-200 | Twin wire binding, lay-flat design, repositionable ruler/bookmark, Scribzee app compatibility | 7.50 | High - waterproof covers, durable wire binding | Research sessions, literature reviews, daily research journals |
SeQes (QiHeng) | 160gsm | 160 | 2 ribbons, pen loop, back pocket, page numbers | 22.23 | Good - sewn binding, synthetic linen cover | Multimedia notes, fountain pen use, illustrated research |
Archer & Olive | 160gsm | 160 | 2 ribbons, pen loop, back pocket, artistic covers | 27.80 | Medium - sewn binding, lies flat | Visual note-taking, artistic spreads, colored pen use |
Scribbles That Matter Pro | 160gsm | 158 | Numbered pages, index pages, pen test page, 2 ribbons | 19.85 | Good - vegan leather cover, sewn binding | Organized research notes, professional settings |
Dingbats Wildlife | 100gsm | 192 | Eco-friendly materials, micro-perforated pages, back pocket | 15.88-25.41 | Good - degradable cover, lies flat | Sustainable note-taking, fountain pen use |
Minimalism Art | 100gsm | 192 | Smythe stitched, ribbon marker, back pocket | 7.90 | Good - flexible cover, lies flat | Budget-friendly research notes |
Leuchtturm1917 | 80gsm | 251 | Numbered pages, index, 2 ribbons, 8 perforated sheets | 15.90 | Good - thread-bound, lies flat | Traditional journaling, pencil use |
When I look at this comparison, several patterns emerge that might not be obvious at first glance. The notebooks with the thickest paper (160gsm) command the highest prices, yet they don't necessarily offer the best functionality for doctoral research. Meanwhile, the Oxford Ring-Bound, with its 90gsm paper and £7.50 price point, provides features that directly address the workflow challenges I encountered during my PhD.
The key insight from my testing is that paper thickness alone doesn't determine usefulness for academic work. What matters more is how the notebook supports your research process - the ability to reference multiple pages simultaneously, the durability to withstand daily use, and the flexibility to adapt to different types of note-taking throughout your doctoral journey.
Conclusion
After months of testing these seven notebooks during my own research work, I can share what I wish someone had told me when I started my PhD journey. The Oxford Ring-Bound A5 Notebook consistently outperformed its competitors in the daily realities of academic work, despite costing a fraction of premium alternatives.
This may surprise you, given the attention that thicker paper and artistic covers receive in bullet journal communities. However, my experience taught me that the most important feature isn't paper thickness or visual appeal - it's how well a notebook integrates into your actual research workflow. The Oxford's twin-wire binding allows you to view two pages simultaneously while maintaining a flat writing surface. This seemingly simple feature transformed how I approached literature reviews and meeting notes.
What I discovered through extensive testing is that the ideal PhD notebook must survive coffee spills in libraries, countless page turns during literature searches, and transport between research locations without falling apart. The Oxford notebooks proved remarkably resilient, with their 90gsm Optik Paper providing excellent writing quality while their durable construction withstood months of heavy academic use.
I made the mistake early in my doctoral work of choosing notebooks based on appearance rather than functionality. The result was frustration when beautiful hardbound journals couldn't accommodate my need to reference multiple pages simultaneously or when expensive paper performed poorly with my preferred pens. These experiences taught me that practical design often matters more than premium materials.
The pricing factor cannot be ignored either. At £7.50, Oxford notebooks allow you to maintain multiple journals without guilt - one for each major project or research area. This affordability removes the psychological barrier of "ruining" an expensive notebook with everyday notes, encouraging the consistent capture of ideas that makes academic work more productive.
Some of you may prefer the thicker paper of SeQes or Archer & Olive notebooks, and that's perfectly valid. However, I encourage you to consider whether those features actually improve your research process or simply feel premium. The goal is completing your PhD successfully, not impressing others with your notebook choice.
My recommendation is straightforward: start with an Oxford Ring-Bound notebook for your primary research work. Test how it fits your workflow before investing in more expensive alternatives. You may find, as I did, that the most practical solution becomes the most valuable tool for academic success.
I wish you the best of luck with your doctoral journey and hope that this comparison helps you choose a notebook that truly supports your research goals rather than merely looking impressive on your desk.
References
[1] - https://stationerynerd.com/160gsmcomparison/
[2] - https://lauralisscott.com/blog/bullet-journal-comparison-leuchtturm-rhodia-midori-muji-northbooks-noleskine/
[3] - https://anjeliqueca.com/blog/2019/bullet-journal-notebook-comparison-guide
[4] - https://thepetiteplanner.com/huge-bullet-journal-notebook-comparison/
[5] - https://oxfordnotebooks.co.uk/products/oxford-my-notes-a5-card-cover-wirebound-notebook-ruled-with-margin-and-perforated-200-page-teal?srsltid=AfmBOoopTNfYKzhX_eB-0W8TPSIU4TK7YzVCkZDaFynhSyFkxd0pyoGR
[6] - https://www.rymanbusiness.com/oxford-office-a5-assorted-metallic-wirebound-notebook-pack-of-5-100101300--4?srsltid=AfmBOooF-OK-ytOuCn44bscESkJajNaGNnkZluAP-Cb66fo-ggxW6QkI
[7] - https://oxfordnotebooks.co.uk/collections/a5-notebooks?srsltid=AfmBOop0w3KGPawYsMWfzPtY7bxpGPPD_XNB1Hz-d3V0-tB8Bi2WMDyN
[8] - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Oxford-My-Notes-Wirebound-Perforated/dp/B07GTJ2YM5
[9] - https://www.ryman.co.uk/oxford-black-n-red-a5-notebook-140-pages-wirebound-hardback-ruled-glossy-1
[10] - https://www.viking-direct.co.uk/en/oxford-black-n-red-wirebound-hardback-notebook-ruled-a5-p-w67000
[11] - https://www.ypo.co.uk/product/detail/paper/books-and-pads/134414
[12] - https://stationerynerd.com/qiheng160/
[13] - https://seqesjournal.com/products/seqes-dotted-journal-notebook-a5-160gsm-ink-proof-paper-6?srsltid=AfmBOoqtIrpPVGsGXOYcrbWeqBtlqGzVt-7g0BTG44LByoYHDhpfeiP7
[14] - https://theusefuljournal.com/product/seqes-2022/
[15] - https://seqesjournal.com/?srsltid=AfmBOopJUimpm50aAGHynGKWeKtAseNvN2aUhbe84bq6iVWVJI-Mf1fM
[16] - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Qiheng-Stationary-Bullet-Dotted-Journals/dp/B07L4LWVDZ
[17] - https://www.archerandolive.com/en-gb/collections/notebooks?srsltid=AfmBOorwypsIrJHk_o7GKWPXXayTApycB9Y0xbwDoGsnnmMyu654hNMs
[18] - https://liliandbella.com/archer-and-olive-notebooks-review/
[19] - https://stationerynerd.com/archerolive160/
[20] - https://paperdream.uk/collections/archer-olive-bullet-journals?srsltid=AfmBOor6DeBZ5gbHI9_SKe_QjI8M6L7OaRU_HltLw6HFz8ESNjf1K-rr
[21] - https://www.archerandolive.com/en-gb?srsltid=AfmBOoo2oEZlaCcyWZmogxPJznlI7WJiTqu8irnrvu5TgJHrV5GNKQg0
[22] - https://www.archerandolive.com/en-gb?srsltid=AfmBOop5rs0Tl1zUOLH5OmV4DCm9lpI1GZVjfr9KRYjB5Ufay4mB-Y5H
[23] - http://rediscoveranalog.com/archer-olive-dot-grid-notepad-reviewarcher-olive-dot-grid-notepad-review/
[24] - https://mashaplans.com/bullet-journal-review-archer-and-olive-dot-grid-notebook/?srsltid=AfmBOoocj7I50PHxrRWiZSuzKaQ-5eQagUOHTe7RCzhASmommGZL-K11
[25] - https://www.archerandolive.com/en-gb/collections/notebooks?srsltid=AfmBOorl36ZTyGU_6SaqpUpsMjMpRHRAszIP6aYfzZYrL0iNPACDGA_r
[26] - https://www.bujoncoffee.com/scribbles-that-matter-journal-pro-version/
[27] - https://stationerynerd.com/stm160/
[28] - https://theusefuljournal.com/product/scribbles-that-matter-120/
[29] - https://wavesofpages.com/scribbles-that-matter-pro-a5-notebook-review/
[30] - https://myinnercreative.com/review-scribbles-matter-pro-b5/
[31] - https://www.gathered.how/buyers-guide/scribbles-that-matter-bullet-journal-review
[32] - https://scribblesthatmatter.com/products/dotted-journal-pro?srsltid=AfmBOopjT3XocCnr_atuIgikhS2UxigmOsj8Cfb0nVIVr783-LAccpSB
[33] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0_202XtteI
[34] - https://shop.wwf.org.uk/products/dingbats-a5-notebooks
[35] - https://www.dingbats-notebooks.com/products/wildlife?srsltid=AfmBOoqJk7vNjOGt7i9nY-I-fCUGMrfRC4XTREzLIrpyeifw5q9Tq9rw
[36] - https://www.pencilcaseblog.com/2017/01/dingbats-wildlife-a5-notebook-review.html
[37] - https://www.dingbats-notebooks.com/
[38] - https://www.dingbats-notebooks.com/products/wildlife?srsltid=AfmBOopyoGiNqdGVFRp2dhHkQCpCfLc2L4V6aC4W8_HlAKd4-2kzUhBo
[39] - https://writingatlarge.com/2021/07/28/dingbats-notebook-review/
[40] - https://thepoorpenman.com/2021/09/17/dingbats-wildlife-notebook-review/
[41] - https://www.dingbats-notebooks.com/products/wildlife-softcover?srsltid=AfmBOoppU8LtAKfG9qqM9-K3zOkDbd4J9604IIKwDzpzlNs08YCsNUM7
[42] - https://comfortableshoesstudio.com/2019/03/review-minimalism-art-classic-notebook/
[43] - https://www.reddit.com/r/fountainpens/comments/1hsoj6m/minimalism_art_notebook_paper_change_for_the_worse/
[44] - https://www.leuchtturm1917.co.uk/notebook-classic.html
[45] - https://www.thejournalshop.com/products/leuchtturm1917-classic-hardcover-notebook-a5?srsltid=AfmBOoqKHT6kDviDgF-u088RTu3D3OEPdDEaUnsbkeQDHCCt-T_v0M-T
[46] - https://brainbaking.com/post/2022/03/leuchtturm-notebook-paper-quality/
[47] - https://www.wellappointeddesk.com/2023/04/notebook-review-leuchtturm1917-hardcover-a5-metallic-edition/
[48] - https://mountainofink.com/blog/notebook-review-leuchtturm-1917-notebook
[49] - https://www.leuchtturm1917.co.uk/notebooks/all-formats/medium-a5/